Letter to the Editor:

Date:

            Eminent Domain should be reserved for public utilities and public infrastructure such as new highways and bridges that benefit all. Summit Pipeline is seeking to use eminent domain to force landowners to give up a portion of their land for their shareholders' profits.

            They are suing South Dakotans in McPherson County because the land owners have denied this private, foreign backed company from coming on to their land to survey it for their personal use. Summit plans to cash in on Federal money (taxpayers money) as part of a green package utilizing carbon credits.

            When other private companies want to do business they either need to own the land or lease the land from a landowner. Why should this be any different? Can you imagine any other business doing the same?

            Let's say an auto mechanic shop wants to open up in town but there isn't any commercial land available. So they go to the PUC and get authorization to eminent domain a portion of the golf course to put up their garage. Then they need a place to dispose of their used oil so they use eminent domain to put a septic tank in your backyard to drain their oil into for storage. The idea is crazy and it doesn't become a good idea when the land owners are farmers or hunting lodges.

            To make matters worse the billions of dollars they will be making is coming straight out of the pockets of you and I. The carbon dioxide in the pipeline is problematic as well. When it leaks it can starve livestock, wildlife or people of oxygen.

            First responders will find themselves walking to the scene as their vehicles will stop running as the co2 levels rise. They will all need special equipment and special training. Right now our volunteer firefighters are in serious need of new radios that cost $8,000 each.  This is where our tax dollars should be going, to properly equip our first responders so they can communicate during emergencies.

            Why task them with additional burdens all so some private company can make their investors and foreign interests super rich? Something doesn't add up.

            I stand with the land owners and I would hate to see who will come knocking  to use your land next if we set this precedent of eminent domain for private gain go through.

-Nichole Cauwels; Brandon, SD

Share post:

spot_img

Related articles

Letter to the Editor: RL 21

            Frustration. That best describes my feeling about the vote on RL 21 (formerly known as Senate bill...

Letters to the Editor: Work requirements

To the Editor,      I am concerned that ordinary well-meaning people might mistake Amendment F for something about helping...

Letter to the Editor: Safety First

Dear Editor: SAFETY FIRST: VOTE NO on RL 21             Have you made plans to purchase your electric car yet?...

Letter to the Editor: CO2 Pipelines

Dear Editor:             North Carolina just had a 1,000-year rainfall and flood.  Nope.  Not anymore.  As a matter of...

Log In

Pierret Benefit this Saturday

Latest articles

Pierret Benefit this Saturday

This Saturday, head to Mike's Bar in Sherman to help support the Mark Pierret Benefit! Mark was in...

Ambulance crew to set new records

By Carrie Moritz, Gazette Garretson Ambulance Supervisor Kurtis Nelson spoke to the Garretson City Council last week Monday about...

Board discusses policies and school vouchers

By Carrie Moritz, Gazette On Monday, the Garretson School Board held their monthly regular meeting and discussed legislative resolutions...

Local Election Summary, voter turnout was high

Last Tuesday, the general election saw a high turnout of voters in South Dakota, with 69.93% of registered...

A New Old Look for the Gazette

You may notice something different about the (printed edition) paper this week. So, to let you in on a...

Shop Garretson first, punch cards!

Shop Garretson First! Shopping locally is even more important now than ever before. The last few years have brought...
s2Member®