Bill prohibits collective bargaining at Regents’ institutions

Date:

By Dana Hess, Community News Service

PIERRE —One of the two bills making their way through the Legislature that would prohibit collecting bargaining by employees of the institutions run by the Board of Regents was approved Tuesday afternoon by the S.D. House of Representatives.

By banning collective bargaining, SB147 would make the state’s universities flexible and adaptive, according to Rep. Jon Hansen, R-Dell Rapids, who noted that collective bargaining is not allowed at the state universities in Texas, North Carolina, Virginia and Georgia.

“All those state have world-class universities,” Hansen said.

Speaking against the bill was Rep. Ray Ring, D-Vermillion, a retired professor of economics.

“Our universities are doing well and have been doing well for 40 years under collective bargaining,” Ring said.

The states Hansen listed have great universities, Ring said, because they have more state resources. Those states “particularly support higher education,” Ring said. “Collective bargaining has worked in South Dakota.”

Rep. Timothy Johns, R-Lead, said he was accustomed to having union members working for the mine in his town. Workers need someone to represent them, Johns said.

“I don’t see where South Dakota is going to benefit,” Johns said of passage of SB147.

Rep. Hugh Bartels, R-Watertown, said it costs the Board of Regents $285,000 in human resources, legal and travel costs to develop a new university contract.

“No one’s disputed those costs,” Bartels said.

If professors fail to provide an education for their students, Hansen said, they should be let go and not subject to the provisions of the collective bargaining agreement.

“That’s what’s best for our taxpayers,” Hansen said. “That’s what’s best for our universities.”

The bill was endorsed by the House on a vote of 47-19. It has already been approved by the Senate. HB1266, a similar bill for banning collective bargaining, has been approved by the House and is up for consideration in the Senate. If both bills pass, it’s likely a committee will be appointed to work out the differences in the bills so that only one would be presented to the governor.

Share post:

spot_img

Related articles

Shared parenting bill fails in committee

By Dana Hess, Community News Service PIERRE — A bill seeking a presumption that parents would have equal access to...

Senate approves riot boosting bill, companion bill offers amendments

By Dana Hess, Community News Service PIERRE — A bill that offers penalties for riot and inciting or boosting a...

Updated texting ban heads for governor

By Dana Hess, Community News Service PIERRE — A ban on most uses of electronic devices while driving was approved...

Offer driver’s license exams in Spanish

By Kelly Hertz, Yankton Daily Press and Dakotan Economic vitality in South Dakota can take many forms — and,...

Log In

Latest articles

Phase One of 4th street project nears completion

Concrete crews have completed all concrete work on 4th Street, Center Avenue and Canyon Avenue including curb and...

Williamson proud of his service & grateful for the Honor Flight

By Garrick Moritz, Gazette Mark Williamson was pretty humble about his recent trip to Washington DC on an Honor...

Jasper man dies in fatal crash

Minnehaha County, S.D.- A Jasper, MN man died in a collision Thursday evening, November 14, three miles north...

Pierret Benefit Well Supported

Though we have not received the final tally of funds raised at the Mark Pierret Benefit held on...

GHS Football celebrates players

The GHS Annual Football Banquet honored the parents and players after a rough season on Monday, Nov. 18. The...

A new sport at Garretson

The rise of powerlifting across the state has found its way back to the Blue Dragons by Delilah Johnson,...
s2Member®