Bill prohibits collective bargaining at Regents’ institutions

Date:

By Dana Hess, Community News Service

PIERRE —One of the two bills making their way through the Legislature that would prohibit collecting bargaining by employees of the institutions run by the Board of Regents was approved Tuesday afternoon by the S.D. House of Representatives.

By banning collective bargaining, SB147 would make the state’s universities flexible and adaptive, according to Rep. Jon Hansen, R-Dell Rapids, who noted that collective bargaining is not allowed at the state universities in Texas, North Carolina, Virginia and Georgia.

“All those state have world-class universities,” Hansen said.

Speaking against the bill was Rep. Ray Ring, D-Vermillion, a retired professor of economics.

“Our universities are doing well and have been doing well for 40 years under collective bargaining,” Ring said.

The states Hansen listed have great universities, Ring said, because they have more state resources. Those states “particularly support higher education,” Ring said. “Collective bargaining has worked in South Dakota.”

Rep. Timothy Johns, R-Lead, said he was accustomed to having union members working for the mine in his town. Workers need someone to represent them, Johns said.

“I don’t see where South Dakota is going to benefit,” Johns said of passage of SB147.

Rep. Hugh Bartels, R-Watertown, said it costs the Board of Regents $285,000 in human resources, legal and travel costs to develop a new university contract.

“No one’s disputed those costs,” Bartels said.

If professors fail to provide an education for their students, Hansen said, they should be let go and not subject to the provisions of the collective bargaining agreement.

“That’s what’s best for our taxpayers,” Hansen said. “That’s what’s best for our universities.”

The bill was endorsed by the House on a vote of 47-19. It has already been approved by the Senate. HB1266, a similar bill for banning collective bargaining, has been approved by the House and is up for consideration in the Senate. If both bills pass, it’s likely a committee will be appointed to work out the differences in the bills so that only one would be presented to the governor.

Share post:

spot_img

Related articles

Shared parenting bill fails in committee

By Dana Hess, Community News Service PIERRE — A bill seeking a presumption that parents would have equal access to...

Senate approves riot boosting bill, companion bill offers amendments

By Dana Hess, Community News Service PIERRE — A bill that offers penalties for riot and inciting or boosting a...

Updated texting ban heads for governor

By Dana Hess, Community News Service PIERRE — A ban on most uses of electronic devices while driving was approved...

Offer driver’s license exams in Spanish

By Kelly Hertz, Yankton Daily Press and Dakotan Economic vitality in South Dakota can take many forms — and,...

Log In

News for 11-7-24

Latest articles

News for 11-7-24

Volleyball heads into the postseason on a high note; Mark Williamson will be the featured speaker at Post...

News for 11-7-2024 (e-edition)

This Week's Issue Download this week's issue Community Events Calendar Volleyball heads into the postseason on a high note; Mark Williamson...

Pasque Medical Massage opens next week

by Carrie Moritz, Gazette             A new business is coming to town, thanks to entrepreneur Allison Neukirchen. She will...

Mother of expelled student follow up phone interview

by Carrie Moritz and Garrick Moritz, Gazette             In a follow-up call to the Gazette, the mother of expelled...

Michelle Pliska keeps her license, despite reprimand

by Carrie Moritz and Garrick Moritz, Gazette             A former Garretson school counselor was publicly reprimanded by the SD...

Ethanol cooperative kicks in another $400,000 to support carbon pipeline ballot question

By: Joshua Haiar, SD Searchlight             A cooperative that owns four ethanol plants has made a second $400,000 contribution to...
s2Member®