Bill prohibits collective bargaining at Regents’ institutions

Date:

By Dana Hess, Community News Service

PIERRE —One of the two bills making their way through the Legislature that would prohibit collecting bargaining by employees of the institutions run by the Board of Regents was approved Tuesday afternoon by the S.D. House of Representatives.

By banning collective bargaining, SB147 would make the state’s universities flexible and adaptive, according to Rep. Jon Hansen, R-Dell Rapids, who noted that collective bargaining is not allowed at the state universities in Texas, North Carolina, Virginia and Georgia.

“All those state have world-class universities,” Hansen said.

Speaking against the bill was Rep. Ray Ring, D-Vermillion, a retired professor of economics.

“Our universities are doing well and have been doing well for 40 years under collective bargaining,” Ring said.

The states Hansen listed have great universities, Ring said, because they have more state resources. Those states “particularly support higher education,” Ring said. “Collective bargaining has worked in South Dakota.”

Rep. Timothy Johns, R-Lead, said he was accustomed to having union members working for the mine in his town. Workers need someone to represent them, Johns said.

“I don’t see where South Dakota is going to benefit,” Johns said of passage of SB147.

Rep. Hugh Bartels, R-Watertown, said it costs the Board of Regents $285,000 in human resources, legal and travel costs to develop a new university contract.

“No one’s disputed those costs,” Bartels said.

If professors fail to provide an education for their students, Hansen said, they should be let go and not subject to the provisions of the collective bargaining agreement.

“That’s what’s best for our taxpayers,” Hansen said. “That’s what’s best for our universities.”

The bill was endorsed by the House on a vote of 47-19. It has already been approved by the Senate. HB1266, a similar bill for banning collective bargaining, has been approved by the House and is up for consideration in the Senate. If both bills pass, it’s likely a committee will be appointed to work out the differences in the bills so that only one would be presented to the governor.

Share post:

spot_img

Related articles

Shared parenting bill fails in committee

By Dana Hess, Community News Service PIERRE — A bill seeking a presumption that parents would have equal access to...

Senate approves riot boosting bill, companion bill offers amendments

By Dana Hess, Community News Service PIERRE — A bill that offers penalties for riot and inciting or boosting a...

Updated texting ban heads for governor

By Dana Hess, Community News Service PIERRE — A ban on most uses of electronic devices while driving was approved...

Offer driver’s license exams in Spanish

By Kelly Hertz, Yankton Daily Press and Dakotan Economic vitality in South Dakota can take many forms — and,...

Log In

Latest articles

Paulson & Farm 484 best in state for specialty produce

By Garrick Moritz, Gazette To say that Dan Paulson of the rural Sherman/Garretson area has a passion for agriculture...

Conversations with Eddie, part 2

In this conversation with Eddie Edmundson, we talk about a family friend in the early years of Garretson. “The...

Minnehaha County Commission votes to adopt Envision 2045 comprehensive plan

By Dave Baumeister County Correspondent SIOUX FALLS – “To create a blueprint” for the future, the Minnehaha County Commission gave...

Dan Paulson of Farm 484 Selected as S.D. Specialty Crop Producer of the Year

From S.D. Specialty Producers Association, SD Dept. Of Ag. & Natural Resources Pierre, S.D.-  Across South Dakota there are...

GHS Wrestlers End their Dual Season 15-8

By Oran Sorenson,  Assistant Coach The end of last week proved to be a busy one for our Garretson wrestlers...

Garretson Lady Dragons improve despite rough week

One final regular season game before postseason begins Last week was a rough one for the Garretson Lady Dragon...
s2Member®